Hoplolaimus floridensis

 

Contents

 

Rev 11/18/2025

Florida Lance Nematode Classification Hosts
Morphology and Anatomy Life Cycle
Return to Hoplolaimus Menu Economic Importance Damage
Distribution Management
Return to Hoplolaimidae Menu Feeding  References
    Go to Nemaplex Main Menu   Go to Dictionary of Terminology

 


 

Classification:

        Tylenchina
        Tylenchoidea
         Hoplolaimidae
          Hoplolaiminae

           Hoplolaimus floridensis Subbotin, Kantor, Consoli, Lyndby,  Michaud, Handoo & Inserra, 2025

Synonym
Hoplolaimus neocoronatus Whiiten, 1957 (nomen nudum, inadequate description)

Back to Top

Morphology and Anatomy:

 

Female: 

  • Body cylindroid, vermiform, tapering slightly at both ends.

  • Head with massive cephalic framework, set off from the rest of the body by a deep constriction with seven annuli

  • Some lip annuli and tare incomplet and the basal annulus is subdividede into blocksso that there appear to be seven on one side of the head and five or six on the other. Two small amphid apertures delimited by the oral disc and the small lateral lip sectors

  • Stylet is strong with tulip-shaped knobs.

  • Pharyngeal glands overlapping the intestine dorsally with three gland nuclei.

  • Lateral field with four prominent lines, strongly aerolated throughout the body. Cuticular annulations are prominent with smooth annules. Phasmids (scutella) arge, conspicuous, and variable in position, with one at the anterior half and the other at the posterior half of the body.

  • Vulva a deep and prominent transverse slit near  mid-body.

  • Didelphic, amphidelphic, ovaries outstretched.

  • Spermatheca round to oval with rounded sperm.

  • Tail broadly truncate to occasionally rounded clavate

Male:

  • Similar to female, except for sexual dimorphism.

  • Monorhic, testis outstretched

  • Spicules, gubernaculum, and bursa are large and prominent, with the bursa extending to the tail tip a


Ref: Subbotin et al., 2025
 

Reported median body size for this species (Length mm; width micrometers; weight micrograms) - Click:

 

 
 
 
Back to Top

Distribution:

Described from the rhizosphere of soil around Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon Pers.) in Citra, Marion County, Florida, USA.

Also associated eith St. Augustine grass (Stenotaphrum secundatum (Walt.) Kuntze) in Alachua County,  and reported from several locations in Collier County and Hendry County, Florida, USA .

Back to Top

Economic Importance:

Initially described as a Q-rated pest in California and later elevated to an A rating (Martin, 2025).

In August 2025, a shipment of outdoor plants from Hillsborough County, Florida, was sampled at the California Border Protection Station at Needles. California Department of Food and Agriculture Nematologist Sergei Subbotin extracted Hoplolaimus floridensis from the sample and identified the nematode with morphological and molecular analyses. He assigned it a Q-rating. Based on the risk to agriculture in California from H. floridensis elevation ot the pest to an A-rating was proposed (Martin, 2025).

Back to Top

Feeding:

Lance nematodes (Hoplolaimus spp.) are considered ectoparasitic, although they can feed as semi- or facultative ecto-endoparasites on the roots of a wide range of plants, some of which are agronomic crops (Fortuner, 1987).

Back to Top

Hosts:

Grasses - Cynodon dactylon (Bermuda grass), Stenotaphrum secundatum (St. Augustine grass), Zyosia sp. (zyosiagrass) (Subbotin et al, 2025).

For an extensive host range list for this species, click

 


 
Back to Top

Life Cycle:

Presumed to be sexually reproducing based on abundance of males and presence of sperm in the spermatheca.

Ecophysiological Parameters:

For Ecophysiological Parameters for this species, click If species level data are not available, click for genus level parameters
Back to Top

Damage:

Lance nematodes are the second-most damaging nematode pest of turfgrass in Florida (after sting nematodes), especially on St. Augustine grass. Lance nematodes cause damage to Bermudagrass putting greens in the southeast, and they are commonly found causing damage on golf courses. While sting nematodes are easier to eliminate with nematicides, lance nematodes have a considerably greater ability to disperse and are much more difficult to control (Crow and Brammer, 2001; Zeng et al., 2012; Martin, 2025)

Back to Top

Management:

Host Plant Resistance, Non-hosts and Crop Rotation alternatives:

For plants reported to have some level of resistance to this species, click
 
Back to Top

References:

Chitambar, J. J., Westerdahl, B. B., and Subbotin, S. A. 2018. Plant Parasitic Nematodes in California Agriculture. In Subbotin, S., Chitambar, J. (eds) Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Sustainable Agriculture of North America. Sustainability in Plant and Crop Protection. Springer, Cham

Crow, W. T. and Brammer, A. S. 2001. Featured Creatures: Lance Nematode. FDACS/DPI https://entnemdept.ufl.edu/creatures/nematode/lance_nematode.htm#imp

Martin, H.J. 2025. California Pest Rating Proposal for Hoplolaimus floridensis Subbotin et al., 2025, Florida Lance Nematode. California Department of Food and Agriculture, Sacramento, California.

Subbotin, S.A., Kantor, M., Consoli, E., Lyndby, N.H., Michaud, A., Handoo, Z., and Inserra, R.N., 2025. Molecular phylogeny and species delimiting for the genus Hoplolaimus (Nematoda: Tylenchida) with description of Hoplolaimus floridensis sp. n. and notes on biogeography of the genus in the United States. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(17), p.8501.

 

Back to Top

Copyright © 1999 by Howard Ferris.
Revised: November 18, 2025.