Mesocriconema curvatum

 

Contents

 

Rev 12/99

  Classification Hosts
Morphology and Anatomy Life Cycle
Return to Mesocriconema Menu Economic Importance Damage
Distribution Management
Return to Criconematidae Menu Feeding  References
    Go to Nemaplex Main Menu   Go To Dictionary of Terminology 

 


Classification:

 
Chromadorea
  Chromadoria
   Tylenchina
       Criconematoidea
         Criconematidae

Mesocriconema curvatum (Raski, 1952) de Grisse & Loof, 1965    

 Synonyms:

      Criconemoides curvatum Raski, 1952

Back to Top

Morphology and Anatomy:

Female:

  • Body stout, slightly curved ventrally; tapering slightly toward both extremities.
  • Annules with smooth posterior margins and generally without anastomoses.
  • Head not offset. Labial disc distinctly lower than in Mesocriconema xenoplax; more or less rectangular with slit-like amphid apertures along its lateral margins. Four well-developed, separate submedian lobes with rounded anterior margins. First annule broken up into labial plates, often irregularly; second annule transverse; third and following annules retrorse.
  • Spear typical for genus, its length (56-70 µm), about 25 times the width of shaft.
  • Excretory pore near base of esophagus.
  • Hemizonid one annule long, often indistinct, located one to two annules anterior to excretory pore.
  • Esophagus typical.
  • Intestine vacuolated, with indistinct outline.
  • Vulva open; in some specimens, anterior lip has two rounded projections. Vagina not sigmoid, running in an oblique to almost transverse direction. Uterus with round spermatheca filled with sperm near its anterior end (several European populations have spermatheca empty).
  • Tail conoid-rounded, terminal annule often only faintly indented.

Male:

  • Body annulation much finer and less prominent than in female; annule width 2.5-3.0 µm at mid-body.
  • Lateral field marked by four longitudinal incisures.
  • Head end rounded.
  • Spear absent, mouth cavity and esophagus poorly developed and indistinct.
  • Spicules slightly curved.
  • Gubernaculum simple, rod-like.
  • Tail tapering to acute terminus, with well-developed bursa.

Female juvenile: General morphology similar to that of female.

Annules with smooth or slightly irregular posterior margins.

Male juvenile: More slender and with more angular annulation than female juvenile. Spear absent.

[Ref: CIH Descriptions of Plant-parasitic Nematodes, Set 4, No. 58 (1974)

 

Reported median body size for this species (Length mm; width micrometers; weight micrograms) - Click:

 

 
Back to Top

Distribution:

Mesocriconema curvatum was originally escribed as Criconemaoides curvatum by Raski (1952) from soil around the roots of antirrhinum sp. (snapdragon) near Colma in San Mateo County, California, USA.

It is reported from the western USA. and also the east coast.  M. curvatum is important in tree and ornamental nurseries in New Jersey.

Back to Top

Economic Importance:

D-rated pest in California Nematode Pest Rating System.

Back to Top

Feeding:

In carnation, it feeds ectoparasitically at root tips and in root hair zone.

Penetrates cell wall by short thrusts of spear; median esophageal bulb then pulsates. The rest of the body remains immobile during feeding.

Anterior end of nematode (and occasionally, the entire body) may become embedded into the root, especially when the population density is high.

Locomotion of the nematode occurs through wave-like contractions of the body, beginning in the tail region and moving anteriorly. Movement is not undulatory, but rectilinear.

In pots, many nematodes remain near the surface; horizontal spreading may be aided by water flow and splashing. Downward movement is probably due chiefly to downward water current.

Back to Top

Hosts:

   Cranberry, peach, clover, strawberry, and carnation.

For an extensive host range list for this species, click


Back to Top

Life Cycle:

Ecophysiological Parameters:

For Ecophysiological Parameters for this species, click If species level data are not available, click for genus level parameters

Optimum temperature is probably near 24 C. At 30 C, reproduction was much lower and the size of the nematodes was slightly smaller than at 15-25 C.

Back to Top

Damage:

Feeding can reduce root weight of carnations by 33% in 6 months; causes destruction of epidermis and necrosis of cortex.

In peach, feeding can cause extensive lesions and pits in roots. Mesocriconema curvatum is considered to be one of the factors involved in peach decline.

In cranberry, feeding causes retarded plant growth and inhibits formation of new runners..

Back to Top

Management:

Steam soil used in greenhouse culture; clean root cuttings.

Applications of nematicides in infected peach orchards results in improved grwoth.

Host Plant Resistance, Non-hosts and Crop Rotation alternatives:

For plants reported to have some level of resistance to this species, click

 

Back to Top

References:

Pinkerton, J. N.; Forge, T. A.; Ivors, K. L.; Ingham, R. E..  1999. Plant-parasitic nematodes associated with grapevines, Vitis vinifera, in Oregon vineyards. Journal of Nematology, 31:624-634.

Brzeski, M., Y.E. Choi and P.A.A. Loof. 2002a.  Compendium of the genus Criconemoides Taylor, 1936 (Nematoda: Criconematidae).  Nematology 4:325-339.

Brzeski, M., P.A.A. Loof and Y.E. Choi . 2002b.  Compendium of the genus Mesocriconema Andrassy, 1965 (Nematoda: Criconematidae).  Nematology 4:341-360.

Cordero, M. A. Robert T. Robbins, Allen L. Szalanski. 2012. Taxonomic and Molecular Identification of Mesocriconema and Criconemoides Species (Nematoda: Criconematidae). J. Nematology 44: 399-426.

Geraert, E. 2010. The Criconematidae of the World: Identification of the Family Criconematidae. Academia Press, Gent. 615p.

Loof, P.A.A and A. De Grisse. 1989. Taxonomic and nomenclatorial observations on the genus Criconemella De Grisse and Loof, 1965 sensu Luc and Raski, 1981. Med. Fac. Landn. Rijksuniv. Gent. 54:53-74.

Raski, D.J. 1952. On the morphology of Criconemoides Taylor, 1936, with descriptions of six new species (Nematoda: Criconematidae). Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 19:85-99.

Raski, D.J. and Luc, M. 1987. A reappraisal of Tylenchina (Nematoda) 10. The superfamily Criconematoidea Taylor, 1936. Revue de Nematologie 10:409-444.

 

Back to Top

 

Copyright © 1999 by Howard Ferris.
Revised: December 17, 2024.